Michel Foucault
Aus AkiWiki
Wiki (Diskussion | Beiträge) (... den Spieß kaputt machen.) |
Wiki (Diskussion | Beiträge) (THE ORDER OF THINGS) |
||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
[[Kategorie:Mensch]] | [[Kategorie:Mensch]] | ||
| + | |||
Pierre Victor: | Pierre Victor: | ||
“Man muß den Spieß umdrehen. | “Man muß den Spieß umdrehen. | ||
| - | Die Welt kann nicht umgestürzt werden, ohne daß dabei etwas kaputt gemacht wird.” | + | Die Welt kann nicht umgestürzt werden, |
| - | Michel Foucault: “Vor allem muß man den Spieß kaputt machen.” | + | ohne daß dabei etwas kaputt gemacht wird.” |
| + | |||
| + | Michel Foucault: | ||
| + | “Vor allem muß man den Spieß kaputt machen.” | ||
| + | |||
(1972) | (1972) | ||
| + | |||
Aus der Foucault-Biografie von Didier Eribon | Aus der Foucault-Biografie von Didier Eribon | ||
| - | + | ||
| + | |||
"Als ... Panait Istrati in den späten | "Als ... Panait Istrati in den späten | ||
| Zeile 18: | Zeile 25: | ||
> zu zerbrechen.' Worauf Istrati antwortete: 'Ich sehe die zerbrochenen | > zu zerbrechen.' Worauf Istrati antwortete: 'Ich sehe die zerbrochenen | ||
> Eier, aber wo ist Euer Omelette?' | > Eier, aber wo ist Euer Omelette?' | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | “In any given culture and at any given moment, there is always only one 'episteme' that defines the conditions of possibility of all knowledge, whether expressed in theory or silently invested in a practice.” | ||
| + | ―from THE ORDER OF THINGS: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (1966) by Michel Foucault | ||
| + | |||
| + | With vast erudition, Foucault cuts across disciplines and reaches back into seventeenth century to show how classical systems of knowledge, which linked all of nature within a great chain of being and analogies between the stars in the heavens and the features in a human face, gave way to the modern sciences of biology, philology, and political economy. The result is nothing less than an archaeology of the sciences that unearths old patterns of meaning and reveals the shocking arbitrariness of our received truths. In the work that established him as the most important French thinker since Sartre, Michel Foucault offers startling evidence that “man”—man as a subject of scientific knowledge—is at best a recent invention, the result of a fundamental mutation in our culture. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 260917 via fb | ||
Version vom 26. September 2017, 22:32 Uhr
Pierre Victor:
“Man muß den Spieß umdrehen.
Die Welt kann nicht umgestürzt werden,
ohne daß dabei etwas kaputt gemacht wird.”
Michel Foucault: “Vor allem muß man den Spieß kaputt machen.”
(1972)
Aus der Foucault-Biografie von Didier Eribon
"Als ... Panait Istrati in den späten
> 1920er-Jahren zur Zeit der ersten Säuberungen und Schauprozesse die
> Sowjetunion besuchte, versuchte ihn ein Sowjetapologet von der
> Notwendigkeit der Gewalt gegen die Feinde der Sowjetunion zu
> überzeugen, indem er sagte: 'Man kann kein Omelette machen, ohne Eier
> zu zerbrechen.' Worauf Istrati antwortete: 'Ich sehe die zerbrochenen
> Eier, aber wo ist Euer Omelette?'
“In any given culture and at any given moment, there is always only one 'episteme' that defines the conditions of possibility of all knowledge, whether expressed in theory or silently invested in a practice.” ―from THE ORDER OF THINGS: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (1966) by Michel Foucault
With vast erudition, Foucault cuts across disciplines and reaches back into seventeenth century to show how classical systems of knowledge, which linked all of nature within a great chain of being and analogies between the stars in the heavens and the features in a human face, gave way to the modern sciences of biology, philology, and political economy. The result is nothing less than an archaeology of the sciences that unearths old patterns of meaning and reveals the shocking arbitrariness of our received truths. In the work that established him as the most important French thinker since Sartre, Michel Foucault offers startling evidence that “man”—man as a subject of scientific knowledge—is at best a recent invention, the result of a fundamental mutation in our culture.
260917 via fb
