Literaturrecherche

Aus AkiWiki

Version vom 27. Juni 2014, 14:54 Uhr von Wiki (Diskussion | Beiträge)

(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)

Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche

Die Welt existiert, um ein Buch zu werden.

Stéphane Mallarmé

hand out ... ==

Lit.suche via BIB-kataloge===

Suche im eigenen OPACs ==

== SWB des BSZ == http://www.bsz-bw.de

== Karlsruher Virtueller Katalog KVK == http://www.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/kvk.html
- - eventuell auf digitale medien einschränken

== Rechercheportal via http://www.bibnetz.de ==

Lit.suche via ==Google ===

===Google Books === - http://books.google.de

===GoogleScholar === - sucht wiss. Literatur ... http://scholar.google.de - Hilfe - http://scholar.google.de/intl/de/scholar/help.html

- Drei google tipps: 1. -wort = wort darf nicht auftauchen. 2. "wort1 wort2" = wörter müssen nebeneinanderstehen. 3. site:www.aki-stuttgart.de = sucht nur im aki-wiki

Info.suche via ==Wikipedia ===

hilfreich sind die Kategorien und die Portale und ...

Links via DIB20, IB-Schulen ... ===

die Nr. 1 an link-slg. ist Del.icio.us http://del.icio.us == == http://del.icio.us.com/help ==

Tutorials === für alle, die sich intensiver einlesen möchten: ... 30 sind aktuell auf Blended Learning

Titre: Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar Auteur: Lasda Bergman, Elaine M. Citation: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2012, Vol.38(6), pp.370-379 Année: 2012

Résumé: Past studies of citation coverage of Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar do not demonstrate a consistent pattern that can be applied to the interdisciplinary mix of resources used in social work research. To determine the utility of these tools to social work researchers, an analysis of citing references to well-known social work journals was conducted. Web of Science had the fewest citing references and almost no variety in source format. Scopus provided higher citation counts, but the pattern of coverage was similar to Web of Science. Google Scholar provided substantially more citing references, but only a relatively small percentage of them were unique scholarly journal articles.The patterns of database coverage were replicated when the citations were broken out for each journal separately. The results of this analysis demonstrate the need to determine what resources constitute scholarly research and reflect the need for future researchers to consider the merits of each database before undertaking their research. This study will be of interest to scholars in library and information science as well as social work, as it facilitates a greater understanding of the strengths and limitations of each database and brings to light important considerations for conducting future research.

Sujet: Citation Analysis Social Work Scopus Web Of Science Google Scholar ISSN: 00991333 No ID: 10.1016/j.acalib.2012.08.002 Indexation: SciVerse ScienceDirect Journals Type: article Note sur la langue: eng