Trau schau wem
Aus AkiWiki
Trau schau wem!
Wie finde ich zuverlässige Quellen im Internet?
Wie bewerte ich Informationen im Internet?
Was sind Fake News?
Wie erkenne ich Fake news?
Wie vermeide ich Fake news?
Trau schau wem! vermittelt Know how für die
- Recherche nach zuverlässigen Quellen im Internet (zB Bibliotheken, öff.rechtliche TV-sender zB SWR, ...),
- die Bewertung von Informationen im Internet, insbesondere Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, ...)
- und die Einschätzung von Wikipedia-artikeln.
Ein wichtiger Part sind Kenntnisse zum Erkennen und Vermeiden von Fake news.
Gerne können die Erfahrungen und Fragen der Teilnehmer-innen mit eingebunden werden.
Referent: Karl Dietz=== Dipl.-Dokumentar (FH) Mobil 0172 768 7976
Trau schau wem! ==
gibt es als
Vortrag, Seminar und als Modul im Blended learning / Personal training
Termine können mit dem Referenten vereinbart werden.
...
...
Termine 2020
interne Fortbildung - 10.01.2020 - VHS Nagold
Blended Learning - 03.2020 - AKI-Stuttgart
incl. modul corona* ... siehe auch die infos auf der main page
Vortrag - 23.03.2020 - VHS Schw. Gmünd - cancelled wg corona
Vortrag - 29.04.2020 - eLife in der Stadtbibliothek Esslingen - cancelled wg corona
Die Veranstaltungsreihe eLife der Stadtbücherei widmet sich Themen rund um Informations- und Medienkompetenz.
...
Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research
Lab-made coronavirus related to SARS can infect human cells.
Declan Butler 12 November 2015
Article toolsRights & Permissions
An experiment that created a hybrid version of a bat coronavirus — one related to the virus that causes SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) — has triggered renewed debate over whether engineering lab variants of viruses with possible pandemic potential is worth the risks.
In an article published in Nature Medicine1 on 9 November, scientists investigated a virus called SHC014, which is found in horseshoe bats in China. The researchers created a chimaeric virus, made up of a surface protein of SHC014 and the backbone of a SARS virus that had been adapted to grow in mice and to mimic human disease. The chimaera infected human airway cells — proving that the surface protein of SHC014 has the necessary structure to bind to a key receptor on the cells and to infect them. It also caused disease in mice, but did not kill them.
Although almost all coronaviruses isolated from bats have not been able to bind to the key human receptor, SHC014 is not the first that can do so. In 2013, researchers reported this ability for the first time in a different coronavirus isolated from the same bat population2.
Related stories Viral-research moratorium called too broad US suspends risky disease research Biosafety in the balance The findings reinforce suspicions that bat coronaviruses capable of directly infecting humans (rather than first needing to evolve in an intermediate animal host) may be more common than previously thought, the researchers say.
But other virologists question whether the information gleaned from the experiment justifies the potential risk. Although the extent of any risk is difficult to assess, Simon Wain-Hobson, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, points out that the researchers have created a novel virus that “grows remarkably well” in human cells. “If the virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory,” he says.
Creation of a chimaera The argument is essentially a rerun of the debate over whether to allow lab research that increases the virulence, ease of spread or host range of dangerous pathogens — what is known as ‘gain-of-function’ research. In October 2014, the US government imposed a moratorium on federal funding of such research on the viruses that cause SARS, influenza and MERS (Middle East respiratory syndrome, a deadly disease caused by a virus that sporadically jumps from camels to people).
The latest study was already under way before the US moratorium began, and the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) allowed it to proceed while it was under review by the agency, says Ralph Baric, an infectious-disease researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, a co-author of the study. The NIH eventually concluded that the work was not so risky as to fall under the moratorium, he says.
But Wain-Hobson disapproves of the study because, he says, it provides little benefit, and reveals little about the risk that the wild SHC014 virus in bats poses to humans.
Other experiments in the study show that the virus in wild bats would need to evolve to pose any threat to humans — a change that may never happen, although it cannot be ruled out. Baric and his team reconstructed the wild virus from its genome sequence and found that it grew poorly in human cell cultures and caused no significant disease in mice.
“The only impact of this work is the creation, in a lab, of a new, non-natural risk,” agrees Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist and biodefence expert at Rutgers University in Piscataway, New Jersey. Both Ebright and Wain-Hobson are long-standing critics of gain-of-function research.
In their paper, the study authors also concede that funders may think twice about allowing such experiments in the future. "Scientific review panels may deem similar studies building chimeric viruses based on circulating strains too risky to pursue," they write, adding that discussion is needed as to "whether these types of chimeric virus studies warrant further investigation versus the inherent risks involved”.
Useful research But Baric and others say the research did have benefits. The study findings “move this virus from a candidate emerging pathogen to a clear and present danger”, says Peter Daszak, who co-authored the 2013 paper. Daszak is president of the EcoHealth Alliance, an international network of scientists, headquartered in New York City, that samples viruses from animals and people in emerging-diseases hotspots across the globe.
Studies testing hybrid viruses in human cell culture and animal models are limited in what they can say about the threat posed by a wild virus, Daszak agrees. But he argues that they can help indicate which pathogens should be prioritized for further research attention.
Without the experiments, says Baric, the SHC014 virus would still be seen as not a threat. Previously, scientists had believed, on the basis of molecular modelling and other studies, that it should not be able to infect human cells. The latest work shows that the virus has already overcome critical barriers, such as being able to latch onto human receptors and efficiently infect human airway cells, he says. “I don't think you can ignore that.” He plans to do further studies with the virus in non-human primates, which may yield data more relevant to humans.
Nature doi:10.1038/nature.2015.18787
1303
...
...
Termine 2019===
E-learning - 03.2019 - AKI-Stuttgart===
E-learning zu Social Media und Fake News im Mai 2019===
Vortrag - 12.03.2019 - VHS Gäufelden ===
Vortrag - 07.05.2019 - VHS Nagold ===
Vortrag - 23.10.2019 - Mediothek Güglingen ===
s.a.
https://bibliotheken.kivbf.de/gueglingen/Service/FAKENEWSerkennen.aspx
Blended Learning - 11.+12.2019 - AKI-Stuttgart===
Vortrag - 15.11.2019 - Stadtbibliothek Herrenberg ===
stadtbibliothek.herrenberg.de/veranstaltung/trau-schau-wem-fake-news-erkennen-und-vermeiden ... storno
Vortrag - 26.11.2019 - VHS Schw. Gmünd ===
Vortrag - 05.12.2019 - Stadtbibliothek Bietigheim-Bissingen ===
...
..
..
..
..
Verbraucherzentrale BW zu Fake-Shops
https://www.verbraucherportal-bw.de/,Lde/Startseite/Verbraucherschutz/Wie+erkenne+ich+Fake-Shops_
Was sind Fake-Shops?===
Fake-Shops sind betrügerische Online-Shops, die in der Regel mit Schnäppchen für teure Markenuhren, Designerkleidung, Schuhe oder Smartphones werben. Oft verlangen sie eine Zahlung mittels Vorauskasse, liefern die versprochene Ware anschließend aber entweder gar nicht oder nur in deutlich schlechterer Qualität als versprochen. Fake-Shops sind mittlerweile sehr professionell gemacht oder sehen den Internetseiten bekannter Anbieter zum Verwechseln ähnlich, so dass es für Verbraucherinnen und Verbraucher schwer ist, sie als solche zu identifizieren. Außerdem ist zu beobachten, dass die Betrügereien mit Fake-Shops variantenreicher und vielfältiger werden.
Welche Ziele verfolgen Fake-Shops?===
Neben Geld einnehmen ist häufig auch das Sammeln persönlicher Daten, wie Kreditkarteninformationen, Namen, Adressen und Geburtsdaten das Ziel. Die Daten werden dann weiterverkauft oder für betrügerische Zwecke genutzt.
FakeShop :: Corona-Virus
Fake-Shops, also gefälschte Online-Plattformen, nutzen die Angst der Menschen vor dem Corona-Virus aus. Betrüger bieten darauf #Atemschutzmasken und andere Medizinprodukte im Namen eines deutschen Unternehmens an. Die Polizei rät: Nicht täuschen lassen und mögliche bezahlte Bestellungen rückgängig machen.
Der Fake-Shop lockt momentan mit Atemschutzmasken und anderen medizinischen Produkten, die aufgrund der Angst um das Corona-Virus ( (SARS-CoV-2 und Covid-19) überall vergriffen sind. Wie das Landeskriminalamt Niedersachsen berichtet, verschicken die Betrüger Spammails im Namen eines deutschen Unternehmens. Wer einem Link in dieser Mail folgt, landet auf der gefälschten Verkaufsplattform.
https://www.polizei-beratung.de
0303 via fb
..
..
Bibliotheken :: corona*
Liste von Bibliotheksschließungen und anderer Maßnahmen: http://blog.bibliothekarisch.de/blog/2020/03/11/corona-und-bibliotheken-auflistung/
Stellungnahme des Deutschen Bibliotheksverbandes e. V. zum Coronavirus und der Situation in den Bibliotheken https://www.oebib.de/beitraege/stellungnahme-des-dbv-zum-coronavirus-und-der-situation-in-den-bibliotheken-279/
Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Corona in Bibliotheken https://www.oebib.de/beitraege/empfehlungen-zum-umgang-mit-corona-in-bibliotheken-282/
Um die Ausbreitung des SARS-COV 19 Virus einzuschränken, werden die Publikumsbereiche der Zentral- und Landesbibliothek Berlin (ZLB) ab Freitag, den 13.03.2020 bis voraussichtlich Sonntag, den 19.04.2020 geschlossen. Auch alle Veranstaltungen der ZLB fallen in diesem Zeitraum aus.
1203 via fb
...
https://ddc.typepad.com/025431/2020/03/covid-19-coronavirus-disease-2019.html
02 March 2020
COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019)
Guest post by Julianne Beall
We hope you are not yet trying to classify books about COVID-19! Why? Because we are not yet sure where to recommend that you class them.
Remember SARS? When we indexed "Severe acute respiratory syndrome—medicine" to 616.2 Diseases of respiratory system, we were following MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). The MeSH heading Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome has Respiratory Tract Infections as the immediate broader term in the MeSH tree structure.
MeSH has not established a heading for COVID-19, but it has established a MeSH Supplementary Concept record. COVID-19 is mapped to Pneumonia, Viral. If the heading, when it is established, has Pneumonia, Viral as the immediate broader heading, we will index COVID-19 (Disease)—medicine to 616.241 Pneumonia.
The 616 number can be added at various places in the 610s and elsewhere, e.g., interdisciplinary number and social services number for respiratory tract diseases 362.1962, interdisciplinary number and social services number for pneumonia 362.196241; incidence of and public measures to prevent respiratory tract diseases 614.592, incidence of and public measures to prevent pneumonia 614.59241.
Stay tuned!
1303 via mail ... tnx
Bibliotheken: Oodi-Bibliothek in Helsinki
Der Common Ground in der modernen demokratischen Stadtgesellschaft: Die Finnen bauen die Bibliothek der Zukunft: digital und analog zugleich.
Fanizadeh, Andreas Oodi-Bibliothek in Helsinki: Bollwerk gegen Populismus. taz, 17.12.2018 https://www.taz.de/!5556260
171218 via mail. tnx.
odi-oodi-i-nea-kentriki-vivliothiki-toy-elsinki
https://www.lifo.gr/articles/almanac/221203/odi-oodi-i-nea-kentriki-vivliothiki-toy-elsinki
090119 viele fotos
