Literaturrecherche

Aus AkiWiki

(Unterschied zwischen Versionen)

Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche

Version vom 27. Juni 2014, 14:54 Uhr

Die Welt existiert, um ein Buch zu werden.

Stéphane Mallarmé

hand out ... ==

Lit.suche via BIB-kataloge===

Suche im eigenen OPACs ==

== SWB des BSZ == http://www.bsz-bw.de

== Karlsruher Virtueller Katalog KVK == http://www.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/kvk.html
- - eventuell auf digitale medien einschränken

== Rechercheportal via http://www.bibnetz.de ==

Lit.suche via ==Google ===

===Google Books === - http://books.google.de

===GoogleScholar === - sucht wiss. Literatur ... http://scholar.google.de - Hilfe - http://scholar.google.de/intl/de/scholar/help.html

- Drei google tipps: 1. -wort = wort darf nicht auftauchen. 2. "wort1 wort2" = wörter müssen nebeneinanderstehen. 3. site:www.aki-stuttgart.de = sucht nur im aki-wiki

Info.suche via ==Wikipedia ===

hilfreich sind die Kategorien und die Portale und ...

Links via DIB20, IB-Schulen ... ===

die Nr. 1 an link-slg. ist Del.icio.us http://del.icio.us == == http://del.icio.us.com/help ==

Tutorials === für alle, die sich intensiver einlesen möchten: ... 30 sind aktuell auf Blended Learning

Titre: Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar Auteur: Lasda Bergman, Elaine M. Citation: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2012, Vol.38(6), pp.370-379 Année: 2012

Résumé: Past studies of citation coverage of Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar do not demonstrate a consistent pattern that can be applied to the interdisciplinary mix of resources used in social work research. To determine the utility of these tools to social work researchers, an analysis of citing references to well-known social work journals was conducted. Web of Science had the fewest citing references and almost no variety in source format. Scopus provided higher citation counts, but the pattern of coverage was similar to Web of Science. Google Scholar provided substantially more citing references, but only a relatively small percentage of them were unique scholarly journal articles.The patterns of database coverage were replicated when the citations were broken out for each journal separately. The results of this analysis demonstrate the need to determine what resources constitute scholarly research and reflect the need for future researchers to consider the merits of each database before undertaking their research. This study will be of interest to scholars in library and information science as well as social work, as it facilitates a greater understanding of the strengths and limitations of each database and brings to light important considerations for conducting future research.

Sujet: Citation Analysis Social Work Scopus Web Of Science Google Scholar ISSN: 00991333 No ID: 10.1016/j.acalib.2012.08.002 Indexation: SciVerse ScienceDirect Journals Type: article Note sur la langue: eng

Online-Kataloge - OPACs

Stadtbibliothek Stuttgart

500.000 Medien ... http://www.stuttgart.de/stadtbuecherei - Stadtbücherei Stuttgart

u.v.a.

Rechercheportal via bibnetz.de

SWB des BSZ

18 Mio. Büchern und Zeitschriften in Bibliothekskatalogen in Südwestdeutschland. http://www.bsz-bw.de

Karlsruher Virtueller Katalog KVK

meta-Katalog für Bücher und Zeitschriften in Bibliotheks- und Buchhandelskatalogen weltweit. http://www.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/kvk.html

=

KVK - Karlsruher Virtueller Katalog http://tinyurl.com/l92

Deutsche National Bibliothek (DNB)

https://portal.dnb.de/opac.htm?method=showSearchForm&selectedCategory=any

Die suche in der DNB geht auch per Wikipedia und GND-verlinkung

s.a. DDB

Recherche im Buchhandel u.a.

http://www.findmybook.de/ - Neue und gebrauchte Bücher

Amazon - http://www.amazon.de

http://www.buch24.de - http://www.buchkatalog.de ... knv.de

VLB - Verzeichnis Lieferbarer Bücher - http://www.buchhandel.de - s.a. neuebuecher.de

www.lesen.ch

...

.

antiquarische Bücher

ZVAB

- http://www.zvab.com - ca. 25 Mio. Bücher bei ca. 4.000 Antiquariaten

abebooks

Projekt Gutenberg

http://www.gutenberg.net (engl.) - http://gutenberg.spiegel.de (dt.)

LibriVox

Rezensionen

Perlentaucher - eine super site!

http://www.perlentaucher.de

IBR

- http://rzblx10.uni-regensburg.de/dbinfo/frontdoor.php?titel_id=858 - paid content

Zeitschriften

ZDB

ca. 1.500 Mio. ZS-Titel in ca. 4.300 Bibliotheken

EZB

Zeitschriftenartikel

ArticleFinder - http://www.infotrieve.com - subscribers only

IngentaConnect - http://www.ingentaconnect.com

http://www.vifapol.de/suche-im-inhalt-von-open-access-zeitschriften/

Bibliotheken via WEBIS

- Sammelschwerpunkte deutscher Bibliotheken http://webis.sub.uni-hamburg.de

E-Books

ekz

Google

Google Books

- http://books.google.de - sucht _in_ Büchern und _in_ Katalogen - zB dem Worldcat von OCLC und in www.rero.ch u.v.a.

GoogleScholar

- sucht wiss. Literatur (analog zu SCI, SSCI, AHI, ...) http://scholar.google.de - Hilfe - http://scholar.google.de/intl/de/scholar/help.html

.

fach20

@@ Zeile 3: / Zeile 3: @@
-== hand out ... ==
+hand out ... ==
+Lit.suche via BIB-kataloge===
-===Lit.suche via BIB-kataloge===
+* Suche im eigenen [[OPAC]]s ==
-* Suche im eigenen Online-Katalog - [[OPAC]]s ==
 * == SWB des [[BSZ]] == http://www.bsz-bw.de
@@ Zeile 18: / Zeile 17: @@
-===Lit.suche via ==[[Google]] ===
+Lit.suche via ==[[Google]] ===
 * ===Google Books === - http://books.google.de
@@ Zeile 27: / Zeile 26: @@
-===Info.suche via ==[[Wikipedia]] ===
+Info.suche via ==[[Wikipedia]] ===
 * hilfreich sind die Kategorien und die Portale und ...
-===Links via [[DIB]]20, [[IB-Schulen]] ... ===
+Links via [[DIB]]20, [[IB-Schulen]] ... ===
 die Nr. 1 an link-slg. ist [[Del.icio.us]]
@@ Zeile 38: / Zeile 37: @@
-===Tutorials ===
+Tutorials ===
 für alle, die sich intensiver einlesen möchten: ... 30 sind aktuell auf [[Blended Learning]]
+Titre:  Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar
+Auteur:  Lasda Bergman, Elaine M.
+Citation:  The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2012, Vol.38(6), pp.370-379
+Année:  2012
-... wer mag, kann ergänzen ...
+Résumé:  Past studies of citation coverage of Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar do not demonstrate a consistent pattern that can be applied to the interdisciplinary mix of resources used in social work research. To determine the utility of these tools to social work researchers, an analysis of citing references to well-known social work journals was conducted. Web of Science had the fewest citing references and almost no variety in source format. Scopus provided higher citation counts, but the pattern of coverage was similar to Web of Science. Google Scholar provided substantially more citing references, but only a relatively small percentage of them were unique scholarly journal articles.The patterns of database coverage were replicated when the citations were broken out for each journal separately. The results of this analysis demonstrate the need to determine what resources constitute scholarly research and reflect the need for future researchers to consider the merits of each database before undertaking their research. This study will be of interest to scholars in library and information science as well as social work, as it facilitates a greater understanding of the strengths and limitations of each database and brings to light important considerations for conducting future research.
+Sujet:  Citation Analysis
+Social Work
+Scopus
+Web Of Science
+Google Scholar
+ISSN:  00991333
+No ID:  10.1016/j.acalib.2012.08.002
+Indexation:  SciVerse ScienceDirect Journals
+Type:  article
+Note sur la langue:  eng
 == Online-Kataloge - [[OPAC]]s ==