LibraryThing
Aus AkiWiki
(Unterschied zwischen Versionen)
Fokus (Diskussion | Beiträge) (web 2.0) |
Wiki (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
(Der Versionsvergleich bezieht 12 dazwischenliegende Versionen mit ein.) | |||
Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
. | . | ||
+ | == LibraryThing online seit 2005 == | ||
+ | |||
+ | http://www.LibraryThing.de | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Du kannst auf mehr als 690 Online-Bibliothekskataloge aus aller Welt zurückgreifen, um Bücher in deinen LibraryThing-Katalog einzutragen (unter anderem auf den Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbund (D), NEBIS (CH), verschiedene Universitätsbibliotheken und auch Amazon). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Importe sind aus einer Vielzahl Quellen möglich. | ||
+ | Du wirst hier Leute mit erschreckend ähnlichem Geschmack finden. | ||
+ | LibraryThing wird dir neue Lektüre vorschlagen (basierend auf dem, was du bisher eingegeben und bewertet hast). | ||
+ | Verleger und Autoren bieten aktiven Mitgliedern kostenlose Rezensionsexemplare an. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Du kannst kostenlos 200 Bücher eintragen. Unbegrenzt viele kannst du für 10 US-$ (pro Jahr) oder 25 US-$ (auf Lebenszeit) eintragen. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[Kategorie:VAB]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <!-- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Im Mai 2006 kaufte Abebooks 40% == | ||
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibraryThing | http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibraryThing | ||
- | + | ||
Vital Statistics | Vital Statistics | ||
Zeile 19: | Zeile 43: | ||
Forum touchstones 74,586 | Forum touchstones 74,586 | ||
- | 1402 | + | 1402-in-anno-olim |
. | . | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | Das Web 2.0 betont den Aspekt der Interaktivität und der Kooperation im Internet. Online Communities erstellen gemeinsam riesige Linksammlungen wie [[ | + | ==[[Web 2.0]] - Communities und [[Social Software]]== |
+ | Das Web 2.0 betont den Aspekt der Interaktivität und der Kooperation im Internet. Online Communities erstellen gemeinsam riesige Linksammlungen wie [[Mister Wong]] oder gemeinsame Kataloge wie [[LibraryThing]] oder die weltweit grösste Enzyklopädie in vielen Sprachen: [[Wikipedia]] oder bloggen oder twittern oder facebooken oder googleplussen oder ... | ||
+ | |||
+ | . | ||
- | |||
. | . | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==LibraryThing: == | ||
+ | ===A web 2.0 project from non librarians - also for libraries?=== | ||
+ | http://opus.bsz-bw.de/hdms/volltexte/2009/669/ | ||
+ | Feißt, Nadine | ||
+ | pdf-Format: | ||
+ | Dokument 1.pdf (4.524 KB) | ||
+ | SWD-Schlagwörter: World Wide Web 2.0 , Soziale Software | ||
+ | Freie Schlagwörter (Deutsch): Bibliothekarische Erschließung , Bibliothek 2.0 , Gemeinschaftliches Indexieren , LibraryThing | ||
+ | Freie Schlagwörter (Englisch): Indexing , Web 2.0 , Library 2.0 , Social tagging , LibraryThing | ||
+ | Studiengang: Bibliotheks- und Medienmanagement | ||
+ | DDC-Sachgruppe: Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft | ||
+ | Dokumentart: Bachelor Thesis | ||
+ | Sprache: Deutsch | ||
+ | Erstellungsjahr: 2009 | ||
+ | Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2009 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Kurzfassung in Deutsch: In dieser Arbeit wird das Webportal LibraryThing dargestellt und analysiert. | ||
+ | Dabei werden die Vor- und Nachteile zwischen der professionellen Erschließung in Bibliotheken und der Erschließung in LibraryThing herausgearbeitet. Zudem werden die Möglichkeiten für Bibliotheken, die eine Integration von LibraryThing in die Bibliothek mit sich bringt, beurteilt. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Hierfür wird LibraryThing zunächst im Überblick dargestellt, bevor dann die Er-schließung in LibraryThing mit der Erschließung in Bibliotheken verglichen wird. Im Anschluss werden Bibliotheken als Praxisbeispiele vorgestellt, bevor abschlie-ßend noch auf die Vor- und Nachteile, sowie auf die mögliche Zukunft von LibraryThing für die bibliothekarische Arbeit eingegangen wird. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Insgesamt hat die Integration des Webportals LibraryThing in eine Bibliothek sowohl für die Mitarbeiter als auch für die Nutzer viele Vorteile. Dennoch wird LibraryThing auch zukünftig die Bibliotheksinformationssysteme in Bibliotheken nie ganz ersetzen, sondern höchstens ergänzen können. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Kurzfassung in Englisch: | ||
+ | |||
+ | In this thesis (“LibraryThing: A web 2.0 project from non librarians – also for libraries?”) the web portal LibraryThing is described and analyzed. | ||
+ | Therefore the pros and cons between the professional indexing in libraries and the indexing in LibraryThing are presented. In addition the possibilities for the libraries integrating LibraryThing in their library work are evaluated. | ||
+ | First an overview of LibraryThing is given before the indexing in LibraryThing and the indexing in libraries are compared to each other. Subsequently several libraries are presented as examples and finally the pros and cons and the possible future for LibraryThing being integrated into the library work is described. | ||
+ | All in all the integration of LibraryThing into libraries brings lots of advantages for both, the staff and the users of the library. However, LibraryThing will never completely displace the library information systems in libraries but could complement it. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Introducing [[RDA]] == | ||
+ | http://www.librarything.de/work/9577440 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Job Opportunity at [[IFLA]] == | ||
+ | Headquarters (Netherlands): | ||
+ | Project Coordination Manager | ||
+ | ===Deadline: 14 November 2016 ... 1710 via fb=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | eric steinhauer== | ||
+ | http://www.librarything.de/work/11165858 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainzer_Riesenbibel | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===The Three Waves of Catalog Enrichment - Part One: Where We’ve Been=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Tim Spalding, President of LibraryThingCatalog enrichment and enhancement—data and features that improve the library catalog—are an increasingly important part of most libraries’ digital strategy. Whereas OPACs were once little more than digital representation of MARC records, they now gleam with covers, reviews, read-alikes and other data and software connecting patrons to what they need, when they need it. Where catalog enrichment going? What should companies like ProQuest and LibraryThing be working on to help libraries into the future? To know where things are heading, it’s worthwhile to look at where we’ve been—to what I’ll term the “waves” of catalog enrichment. Two waves have already happened, as we’ll explore here, and a third may be on the horizon, as we’ll discover in the second installment of this two-part blog series. The First WaveThe first wave of catalog enrichment was all about static elements—book summaries, tables of contents, published reviews and other bits of text. One element, cover images, was graphical. Syndetic Solutions, now part of the ProQuest family, was a leader in this wave. And such elements remain the backbone of catalog enrichment.While static in conception, the underlying technology was potentially dynamic. If a cover was wrong, it could be swapped. If a new review appeared, it could be added. Enrichments were largely fixed URLs in MARC records and the little pop-up windows they triggered—what one industry insider called “the magical ‘added info’ button.” But even as they appeared to be static “additions” to the record, they held the technical capacity to do anything the web itself could do.Much of the impetus toward such enrichments came from the growing sense that Amazon—for all its faults—was doing something right: presenting books in a way patrons wanted to see them. Catalog enrichments, together with improvements to core search functions, were touted as a way to “Amazonize” the OPAC .The Second WaveThe second wave was, at its root, a technical revolution. And, as far as I can tell, I started it in late 2006—in the shower.I created LibraryThing itself in 2005 as a service for readers to catalog, organize, rate and review the books they owned or read. Though individually tiny, LibraryThing’s combined “catalog” soon grew to eclipse the largest libraries in the world, and comprise the second-largest source of user reviews for books, after Amazon. I knew all this data could enhance traditional library OPACs, if LibraryThing could only get “into” them. But how? (Cue the shower—mankind’s greatest thinking machine!)We had to do it alone. The ILS vendors had given us the cold shoulder. But how? Installed software? Proxies? iFrames? Flash? When I got to cross-site JavaScript, I almost dismissed the idea. It couldn’t be that easy, or everyone would be doing it. Ten minutes later—LibraryThing was a startup running out of my home—I was dry, and discussing it with a recent hire with better JavaScript chops. Of course it would work; companies were doing similar stuff elsewhere on the internet. Let’s do it!The JavaScript solution—swiftly embraced by other companies—opened up possibilities. Once included on the page, JavaScript could do anything the web could do. Static content could be placed directly on the page, designed to look like it was always there—no MARC fields or pop-ups needed. And dynamic content could be added. It was a new world.For LibraryThing, this second wave started with exposing user data, especially the millions of reviews and tags applied by LibraryThing members. Other companies create similar products. More than just data, however, the dynamic nature of the technology moved catalog enrichment beyond data into full-fledged two-way services. Through the magic of JavaScript enrichment, library patrons could add their own reviews, create lists, and search and browse hand-picked and algorithmic read-alikes while still essentially “in” the catalog itself, not off on some external website.Here again, the effort often sought to “catch up” to Amazon and the growing number of sites with user reviews and “more like this” options. Whereas such features were once regarded with a certain amount of suspicion in libraries, they became welcome and expected.Check out the Third Wave of Catalog Enrichment to explore where we might be headed next, coming soon in part two of this two-part series! | ||
+ | Tim Spalding, President of LibraryThing | ||
+ | |||
+ | Catalog enrichment and enhancement—data and features that improve the library catalog—are an increasingly important part of most libraries’ digital strategy. Whereas OPACs were once little more than a digital representation of MARC records, they now gleam with covers, reviews, read-alikes and other data and software connecting patrons to what they need, when they need it. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Where is catalog enrichment going? What should companies like ProQuest and LibraryThing be working on to help libraries into the future? | ||
+ | |||
+ | To know where things are heading, it’s worthwhile to look at where we’ve been—to what I’ll term the “waves” of catalog enrichment. Two waves have already happened, as we’ll explore here, and a third may be on the horizon as we’ll discover in the second installment of this two-part blog series. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The first wave | ||
+ | |||
+ | The first wave of catalog enrichment was all about static elements—book summaries, tables of contents, published reviews and other bits of text. One element, cover images, was graphical. Syndetic Solutions, now part of the ProQuest family, was a leader in this wave. And such elements remain the backbone of catalog enrichment. | ||
+ | |||
+ | While static in conception, the underlying technology was potentially dynamic. If a cover was wrong, it could be swapped. If a new review appeared, it could be added. Enrichments were largely fixed URLs in MARC records and the little pop-up windows they triggered—what one industry insider called “the magical ‘added info’ button.” But even as they appeared to be static “additions” to the record, they held the technical capacity to do anything the web itself could do. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Much of the impetus toward such enrichments came from the growing sense that Amazon—for all its faults—was doing something right: presenting books in a way patrons wanted to see them. Catalog enrichments, together with improvements to core search functions, were touted as a way to “Amazonize” the OPAC. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The second wave | ||
+ | |||
+ | The second wave was, at its root, a technical revolution. And, as far as I can tell, I started it in late 2006—in the shower. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I created LibraryThing itself in 2005 as a service for readers to catalog, organize, rate and review the books they owned or read. Though individually tiny, LibraryThing’s combined “catalog” soon grew to eclipse the largest libraries in the world, and comprise the second-largest source of user reviews for books, after Amazon. I knew all this data could enhance traditional library OPACs if LibraryThing could only get “into” them. But how? (Cue the shower—mankind’s greatest thinking machine!) | ||
+ | |||
+ | We had to do it alone. The ILS vendors had given us the cold shoulder. But how? Installed software? Proxies? iFrames? Flash? When I got to cross-site JavaScript, I almost dismissed the idea. It couldn’t be that easy, or everyone would be doing it. Ten minutes later—LibraryThing was a startup running out of my home—I was dry, and discussing it with a recent hire with better JavaScript chops. Of course, it would work; companies were doing similar stuff elsewhere on the internet. Let’s do it! | ||
+ | |||
+ | The JavaScript solution—swiftly embraced by other companies—opened up possibilities. Once included on the page, JavaScript could do anything the web could do. Static content could be placed directly on the page, designed to look like it was always there—no MARC fields or pop-ups needed. And dynamic content could be added. It was a new world. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For LibraryThing, this second wave started with exposing user data, especially the millions of reviews and tags applied by LibraryThing members. Other companies create similar products. More than just data, however, the dynamic nature of the technology moved catalog enrichment beyond data into full-fledged two-way services. Through the magic of JavaScript enrichment, library patrons could add their own reviews, create lists, and search and browse hand-picked and algorithmic read-alikes while still essentially “in” the catalog itself, not off on some external website. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here again, the effort often sought to “catch up” to Amazon and the growing number of sites with user reviews and “more like this” options. Whereas such features were once regarded with a certain amount of suspicion in libraries, they became welcome and expected. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Check out the Third Wave of Catalog Enrichment to explore where we might be headed next, coming soon in part two of this two-part series! | ||
+ | |||
+ | 20 Jun 2016 | ||
+ | |||
+ | http://www.proquest.com/blog/pqblog/2016/The-Three-Waves-of-Catalog-Enrichment---Part-One-Where-Weve-Been.html | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===The Three Waves of Catalog Enrichment - Part Two: Where Will We Go Next?=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | SushiTim Spalding, President of LibraryThingToward the Third Wave of Catalog EnrichmentIn the first of this two-part series , we took a look at the two waves of development that have enriched and enhanced library catalogs. What will a third wave of catalog enrichment look like? I’m not sure. I don’t see Amazon blazing a trail ahead of libraries anymore. Perhaps some bright future programmer will emerge from the shower with the best answer. Until then, I have a few ideas.First, future catalog enrichments must advance the overall revolution of user experience. Too many catalogs today resemble ransom notes—jumbled collections of discordant pieces, with enrichments just more jangly bits. Future enrichments must prioritize simplicity over complexity, insight over data, and usability over merely “having it there.” Usability data provide some answers. From analyzing usage statistics from hundreds of catalogs, LibraryThing has learned that enrichments hidden behind tabs or other such elements are effectively invisible, and rarely used. Users have been trained to scroll up and down, but they are averse to clicking to see “what else there is.” (Amazon, the king of user-testing data knows this, which is why their pages are long.) This is just one example, but it points a way. Future catalog enrichments must prioritize user experience, and collect and analyze the data that shows user-experience success.Library EnrichmentsUser experience also throws the distinction between website and catalog into question. Libraries think of them as separate things, often placing them under separate teams. But users do not. Future catalog enrichments must be conceived of as library enrichments, appearing inside or outside of the catalog as needed. In this age of mobile access, library enrichments must adapt themselves seamlessly to web and mobile formats. Nor should the website and catalog be the final horizon. Libraries today exist on social media as much as anywhere else; enrichments should too. This is something LibraryThing has endeavored to do with our Book Display Widgets product—an all-purpose “display rack” for a library’s catalog, blog, website, Facebook, Pinterest or Twitter. But there’s so much more to do in bringing the library into the world, and the world into the library.True “library” enrichment also extends well past books and into all the other resources libraries have to offer. In the near-term, this may mean video games, movies and music. Some enrichments, such as ProQuest’s Video Game Enriched Content , already address these. In the future, however, event programming, maker spaces and all forms of audience and community outreach will enhance each other seamlessly and automatically, with no technical constraints. Nor would the library stop at its walls and website. Finding a book in the catalog, you’d learn the author is coming to the library next month, and the local bookstore the month after. Search for something on Google and some excellent hits from your library would show up on the page as well. Order sushi, and your library holds would also arrive. (Okay, that might just be my dream).Silos and Walled GardensUnfortunately, things may be heading in the other direction. Collections are increasingly divided between “the catalog,” and a host of siloed solutions—separate “catalogs” for services that provide ebooks, movies and music—leading to a fractured user experience. Some libraries have completely separate web and mobile catalog solutions. And many have apps, kiosks, digital signage and self check-out stations, all concerned with the same collection, yet technologically distinct and largely unenhanced. Catalog vendors, digital providers and enrichment services must work together to create rich, but unified, offerings. Even as technology unifies, libraries must resist closed solutions and “walled gardens.” Catalogs and other services must be open to enrichment, not just for enrichment vendors with a business relationship to the ILS companies. Such freedom is essential to the many home-grown and collaborative, open-source enhancement projects too. We can expect growth there, as more and more libraries recognize a need for dedicated developers, and the community of library developers grows.Find, Discover… and Trip OverIn preparing for this piece, I asked people on Twitter what they thought the next phase of catalog enrichment was. Jason Griffey suggested “interactive bots” and “chat interfaces.” I have my doubts about artificial intelligence solutions, but the suggestion points out something about the bounded nature of catalogs and catalog enrichment—catalogs aren’t librarians.What’s the difference? For starters, library catalogs are good for specific, focused searching. Current enrichments have given patrons the ability to discover high-quality “read-alikes.” But that’s as far as it goes. And patrons don’t want read-alikes—they want great reads! More can be done technologically. I think we’re still in the infancy of recommender systems, and “serendipity-systems” have barely been tried. But the best resource will remain a librarian, assisted by technology. Catalog enrichments must recognize that, by incorporating the librarians into their library’s enhancements. Finally, a good visit to the library nets some things you wanted, some things like the things you wanted, and some things you didn’t know you wanted. Serendipity and “tripping over things” plays a role in library discovery that has yet to find a home in software. After that, Jason can get his chat bots, if I get my sushi books. Here’s to the future! | ||
+ | Tim Spalding, President of LibraryThing | ||
+ | |||
+ | Toward the third wave of catalog enrichment | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the first of this two-part series, we took a look at the two waves of development that have enriched and enhanced library catalogs. What will a third wave of catalog enrichment look like? | ||
+ | |||
+ | I’m not sure. I don’t see Amazon blazing a trail ahead of libraries anymore. Perhaps some bright future programmer will emerge from the shower with the best answer. Until then, I have a few ideas. | ||
+ | |||
+ | First, future catalog enrichments must advance the overall revolution of user experience. Too many catalogs today resemble ransom notes—jumbled collections of discordant pieces, with enrichments just more jangly bits. Future enrichments must prioritize simplicity over complexity, insight over data, and usability over merely “having it there.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | Usability data provide some answers. From analyzing usage statistics from hundreds of catalogs, LibraryThing has learned that enrichments hidden behind tabs or other such elements are effectively invisible and rarely used. Users have been trained to scroll up and down, but they are averse to clicking to see “what else there is.” (Amazon, the king of user-testing data knows this, which is why their pages are long). | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is just one example, but it points a way. Future catalog enrichments must prioritize user experience, and collect and analyze the data that shows user-experience success. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Library enrichments | ||
+ | |||
+ | User experience also throws the distinction between website and catalog into question. Libraries think of them as separate things, often placing them under separate teams. But users do not. Future catalog enrichments must be conceived of as library enrichments, appearing inside or outside of the catalog as needed. In this age of mobile access, library enrichments must adapt themselves seamlessly to web and mobile formats. Nor should the website and catalog be the final horizon. Libraries today exist on social media as much as anywhere else; enrichments should too. This is something LibraryThing has endeavored to do with our Book Display Widgets product—an all-purpose “display rack” for a library’s catalog, blog, website, Facebook, Pinterest or Twitter. But there’s so much more to do in bringing the library into the world, and the world into the library. | ||
+ | |||
+ | True “library” enrichment also extends well past books and into all the other resources libraries have to offer. In the near-term, this may mean video games, movies, and music. Some enrichments, such as ProQuest’s Video Game Enriched Content, already address these. In the future, however, event programming, maker spaces and all forms of audience and community outreach will enhance each other seamlessly and automatically, with no technical constraints. Nor would the library stop at its walls and website. Finding a book in the catalog, you’d learn the author is coming to the library next month, and the local bookstore the month after. Search for something on Google and some excellent hits from your library would show up on the page as well. Order sushi and your library holds would also arrive. (Okay, that might just be my dream). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Silos and walled gardens | ||
+ | |||
+ | Unfortunately, things may be heading in the other direction. Collections are increasingly divided between “the catalog,” and a host of siloed solutions—separate “catalogs” for services that provide ebooks, movies, and music—leading to a fractured user experience. Some libraries have completely separate web and mobile catalog solutions. And many have apps, kiosks, digital signage and self check-out stations, all concerned with the same collection, yet technologically distinct and largely unenhanced. Catalog vendors, digital providers, and enrichment services must work together to create rich, but unified, offerings. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Even as technology unifies, libraries must resist closed solutions and “walled gardens.” Catalogs and other services must be open to enrichment, not just for enrichment vendors with a business relationship to the ILS companies. Such freedom is essential to the many home-grown and collaborative, open-source enhancement projects too. We can expect growth there, as more and more libraries recognize a need for dedicated developers, and the community of library developers grows. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Find, discover… and trip over | ||
+ | |||
+ | In preparing for this piece, I asked people on Twitter what they thought the next phase of catalog enrichment was. Jason Griffey suggested “interactive bots” and “chat interfaces.” I have my doubts about artificial intelligence solutions, but the suggestion points out something about the bounded nature of catalogs and catalog enrichment—catalogs aren’t librarians. | ||
+ | |||
+ | What’s the difference? For starters, library catalogs are good for specific, focused searching. Current enrichments have given patrons the ability to discover high-quality “read-alikes.” But that’s as far as it goes. And patrons don’t want read-alikes—they want great reads! | ||
+ | |||
+ | More can be done technologically. I think we’re still in the infancy of recommender systems, and “serendipity-systems” have barely been tried. But the best resource will remain a librarian, assisted by technology. Catalog enrichments must recognize that, by incorporating the librarians into their library’s enhancements. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Finally, a good visit to the library nets some things you wanted, some things like the things you wanted, and some things you didn’t know you wanted. Serendipity and “tripping over things” plays a role in library discovery that has yet to find a home in software. | ||
+ | |||
+ | After that, Jason can get his chat bots if I get my sushi books. Here’s to the future! | ||
+ | |||
+ | 22 Jun 2016 | ||
+ | |||
+ | http://www.proquest.com/blog/pqblog/2016/The-Three-Waves-of-Catalog-Enrichment---Part-Two-Where-Will-We-Go-Next.html | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Titelarchiv als kostenlose Datenbank == | ||
+ | Deutscher Jugendliteraturpreis 1956 bis 2011 | ||
+ | www.bib-info.de | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==»Mich stört da gar nicht so sehr, == | ||
+ | was man so Raubkopie nennt, die Illegalität. Was mich stört, ist eine gewisse Schäbigkeit, ist diese Schnäppchenmentalität. Ich würde sogar sagen, in dieser ganzen so genannten Netzgemeinde gibt es viel Spießigkeit, Leute, die den Ausverkauf betreiben, alles muss billig sein. Sehr unangenehm.« Hans Magnus Enzensberger | ||
+ | http://www.welt.de/print/die_welt/literatur/article106407137/Oh-je-politisch-korrekt.html | ||
+ | |||
. | . | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Den Trailer zum Wissensportal der ETH-Bibliothek gibt es jetzt mit Sound! == | ||
+ | http://fb.me/CnACfSBM ... 2607 | ||
+ | |||
+ | . | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==In St. Petersburg == | ||
+ | ist am 10.01.2013 ein Steve-Jobs-Denkmal enthüllt worden. Es steht auf dem Gelände der Uni für Informationstechnologie, Mechanik und Optik und hat die Form eines iPhone. Zudem ist es interaktiv und macht mit Jobs' Biographie vertraut. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | JETZTMUSIKFESTIVAL 2013 == | ||
+ | - Die Schnittstelle zu Kunst, Film, Literatur, Tanz und Bildung. Das Jetztmusikfestival geht mit zahlreichen Events in die siebte Runde. | ||
+ | 30. März bis 6. April 2013 Mannheim | ||
+ | |||
+ | Elektronische Musik gehört in die Clubs, Kunst in die Museen? Eine angestaubte Vorstellung, die das Jetztmusikfestival Jahr für Jahr in der Abstellkammer der Kulturdogmen deponiert. Für eine Woche verzichten Hoch- und Subkultur auf ihre Vorsilben und finden in spannenden Crossover-Projekten zusammen. Projekte, die mehr 'am Puls der Zeit' als 'zeitlos' sind: von beschaulicher Wohnzimmeratmosphäre im Börsensaal, kreativen Flüssen auf heimischen Seen oder der seltenen Möglichkeit einen halben Tag in wenigen Minuten zu durchleben. Für eine Woche lebt in Mannheim eine temporäre Schnittstelle zwischen elektronischer Musik und anderen Kunstgattungen auf. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Montag 1. April – City Airport Mannheim | ||
+ | Chronostasis | ||
+ | Nur aus Geräuschen von Uhren hat der Berliner Klangkünstler Andreas Bick ein außergewöhnliches Hörerlebnis geschaffen: Chronostasis. Der Videokünstler Dominik Rinnhofer konzipierte Visuals dazu, die, live aufgeführt, den Besucher auch visuell auf der akustischen Reise durch die Zeit begleiten. | ||
+ | Facebook Event: https://www.facebook.com/events/461440293905606/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dienstag 2. April – Atlantis Kino Mannheim | ||
+ | DE:BUG präsentiert: le cinéma abstrait: nosferatu - Cinemix | ||
+ | Facebook Event: https://www.facebook.com/events/475430699161075/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Donnerstag 4. April – Planetarium Mannheim | ||
+ | Jacques Palminger & the Kings of Dubrock | ||
+ | Facebook Event: https://www.facebook.com/events/397099787044879/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Das gesamte Programm des Jetztmusikfestivals und alle Infos findet ihr unter: www.jetztmusikfestival.de | ||
+ | |||
+ | --> |
Aktuelle Version vom 2. April 2019, 17:37 Uhr
.
LibraryThing online seit 2005
Du kannst auf mehr als 690 Online-Bibliothekskataloge aus aller Welt zurückgreifen, um Bücher in deinen LibraryThing-Katalog einzutragen (unter anderem auf den Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbund (D), NEBIS (CH), verschiedene Universitätsbibliotheken und auch Amazon).
Importe sind aus einer Vielzahl Quellen möglich. Du wirst hier Leute mit erschreckend ähnlichem Geschmack finden. LibraryThing wird dir neue Lektüre vorschlagen (basierend auf dem, was du bisher eingegeben und bewertet hast). Verleger und Autoren bieten aktiven Mitgliedern kostenlose Rezensionsexemplare an.
Du kannst kostenlos 200 Bücher eintragen. Unbegrenzt viele kannst du für 10 US-$ (pro Jahr) oder 25 US-$ (auf Lebenszeit) eintragen.