FID

Aus AkiWiki

Version vom 19. März 2016, 16:59 Uhr

FID

FID's mit Lizenzen

http://www.fid-lizenzen.de/fid

Erziehungswissenschaft

http://www.dipf.de/de/forschung/projekte/fachinformationsdienst-fid-erziehungswissenschaft-und-bildungsforschung

Jüdische Studien

Die Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg der > > Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main ist eine der größten > > Universitätsbibliotheken Deutschlands und besitzt eine weltweit bedeutende > > Judaica- und Hebraica-Sammlung. Im Rahmen eines von der DFG geförderten > > Projekts wird gemeinsam mit der Hochschule der Medien HdM in Stuttgart ein > > Online-Fachinformationsdienst FID Jüdische Studien entwickelt.

Dazu der Hintergrund: DFG-Fördermittel in Höhe von 1,8 Mio für Bibliothek http://www.muk.uni-frankfurt.de/59868757/027

GEO

incl. aktuelle stellen via inetbib und obj2 und ... 1103 ... s.a. die suche nach geofiz hier im aki-wiki ...

Guardian journalists - not so hot on research

If you've a few minutes to spare, take a look at How to use search like a pro, 10 tips and tricks for Google and beyond.

It's written by Samuel Gibbs and you can find his Twitter account as well. I'd show it to you, but he's blocked me, for reasons that will become obvious. You can read a great deconstruction of his article by Karen Blakeman on her blog 'Guardian's top search tips for Google not quite tip top'. However, just because Karen has done a great article isn't going to stop me, so read both! I'm going to do the same as Karen, and go through his work tip by tip.

Exact Phrase He's right in that if you want to search for two words next to each other in the same order, you need to put them in a phrase, using "double quotes". He says 'searching for “Joe Bloggs” will surface only those that specifically have the name Joe Bloggs somewhere on the page.' What he fails to mention is that it doesn't always work. For example, and I'm using an example from Dan Russell here (who is more of an expert than I'll ever be) that a search for "Daniel Russell" can also give you results for Dan Russel. In order to get what we're exactly after means that we have to do a search for "Daniel "Russell"" with double quotes inside double quotes. It's true that this isn't going to happen that often, but nonetheless, it does happen.

Exclude terms. He's right to say that you can use the minus symbol to exclude terms, so a search for journalist -idiot should give us pages that contain the word journalist, without the word idiot. However, his example is "A search for “Joe Bloggs” -jeans will find results for Joe Bloggs, but it will exclude those results for the Joe Bloggs brand of jeans." No, it won't. It will exclude pages that contain the words Joe Bloggs as a phrase, and will exclude any that have the word jeans on the page, not necessarily anything to do with the brand. It's a subtle but important difference.

OR search - yes, no disagreement with him there.

Synonym search. Mr Gibbs is convinced that the search functionality of the tilde (~) still works, despite the fact that Google killed it in 2013. He includes a screenshot in his article that he purports showing it working - he's done a search for plumbing ~university. Try a search for plumbing ~university yourself. It may look different to his screen shot, but you'll either see results for plumbers plumbing and university, or just plumbing and university.

Now, IF the tilde symbol worked, because of where he's put it, Google should be looking for alternatives to 'university', but clearly the results are showing us examples with the word University in them. If he was trying for alternatives to plumbing, he should have put the tilde there. However, since it doesn't work, it's a moot point. He may be assuming that it does work, since we have examples of Plumbers and plumbing, but what he hasn't understood is that Google will automatically try and find synonyms now, without the use of the ~ symbol. As a result, we're going to have a bunch of people wasting their time and energy trying to use a function that not only doesn't work - it doesn't exist any more.

Site search Yup, he's on the money with this one. Using site:.uk for example limits you to site URLs that end in .uk.

The power of the asterisk. A search for three * mice will pick up results for three blind mice, three tailed mice, three button mice and so on. So it can be used to replace a word. But it can't, as Mr Gibbs suggest, replace letters in a word - it's not a truncation tool. If you include an * in a word, such as librar* Google will just work out similar words based on the stem of the word, and Karen has given a great example of how this works in practice.

Searching between two values. Yes, he's right with this. A search for 50 .. 100 will give you results that have numbers in that range.

Searching in specific fields. Once again he's right, but only so far as he goes. Another useful search function, as pointed out by Karen is intext: and I'll let you visit her blog post to see why.

Related sites. This is a great function, and Mr Gibbs is right to include it. related:theguardian.com will indeed give you websites that Google deems to be similar. However, there's a limit to what Google returns - it's usually a fairly small number here, and it's by no means comprehensive. You're better off doing a search on something like http://www.similarpages.com/

Combine searches. Agree entirely with this - you are not limited to just a few options, if you wish, you can include several different search functions to really reduce the number of results that you get.

Karen rightly points out that there are whole number of other search terms that could be included in an article like this, and again I'd encourage you to read her blog post about it. I get why he may not have included them - as he said in his Twitter account, he learned a lot from researching the article, but it's a shame that he didn't actually research a little bit more thoroughly.

Oh, and Mr Gibbs - you're most welcome to call me a 'dick' if it makes you feel better, and you're most welcome to block me on Twitter, but both things show rather more about you than they do about me.

wow. seen via netbib. 110316

Kriminologie

http://www.ub.uni-tuebingen.de/fachgebiete/kriminologie-fid.html

Kunst

http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/fachinfo/kunst/info.html

Mathematik

@FIDMathematik ==== auf dem Weg zum Fachinformationsdienst (FID) Mathematik http://vifamath.de http://vifamath.de/top-menu/ueber-vifamath/ssg-fid-wechsel

Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft

adlr.link: Advanced Delivery of Library Resources for Communication and Media Studies

http://blog.adlr.link/

Stoppe, Sebastian: Was Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaftler von einem Fachinformationsdienst erwarten: Design und Ergebnisse einer Fachcommunity-Befragung. // In: o-bib. - 2 (2015),3, S. 37-62

http://dx.doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2015H3S37-62

Nordeuropa

https://www.ub.uni-kiel.de/fach/sondersammlung

http://www.vifanord.de/index.php?id=14&L=

Pharmazie

http://www.biblio.tu-bs.de/fid/

Recht

http://staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/recherche/fachgebiete/rechtswissenschaft/

Romanistik

Kurz vor Weihnachten kam die gute Nachricht: Im Rahmen eines neuen DFG-Förderprogramms erhielten die Stabi Hamburg und die Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Bonn von der DFG die Bewilligung zum Aufbau eines Fachinformationsdienstes für die romanistische Forschung in Deutschland. Im Mittelpunkt der dreijährigen Förderphase von 2016 bis 2018 stehen: die breit gefächerte Sammlung von Primärliteratur und Quellen von Romanen, Gedichtbänden und Theaterstücken bis zu Comics, Drehbüchern, Spielfilmen oder Audiokorpora in den verschiedenen romanischen Sprachen… [ 238 more words. ] http://blog.sub.uni-hamburg.de/?p=19374

160116 via fb

Theater und Tanz

Fachinformationsdienst (FID) Darstellende Kunst für die Theater- und Tanzwissenschaft

https://www.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/projekte/theater.html

http://www.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/theater/fid.html

Informatiker/in für Fachinformations­dienst zu Theater und Tanz, bis E 13 TV-G-U, auf 3 Jahre befristet http://bit.ly/1BVPU70 #obj2 ... 1901 via t.

Theologie

http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/?id=1902

http://www.ub.uni-tuebingen.de/fachgebiete/fachinformationsdienste-sondersammelgebiete.html

Abgelehnte FID-Anträge

Seefischerei: http://www.vdff-fischerei.de/index.php?id=9&type=98&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=79&cHash=71da61575825fb9e754a008341cf7628

ZPID zu FID

"... In Zukunft werden in vielen Fächern sogenannte Fachinformationsdienste die Informationsversorgung übernehmen. Die Änderung ist tiefgreifend, da sie nicht nur eine Bevorzugung elektronischer Medien bedeutet, sondern vor allem eine Abkehr von der antizipativen und somit vollständigen Erwerbung, d.h. die Erwerbungen werden auf den aktuellen Forschungsbedarf ausgerichtet, so dass aus unserer Sicht Lücken im zukünftigen Bedarf, der sich eben nicht planen lässt, vorprogrammiert sind. Da wir der Meinung sind, dass dieses Konzept nicht zukunftsfähig ist, haben wir von einer Bewerbung abgesehen (viele andere Fächer werden ebenfalls ohne Fachinformationsdienst bleiben, da die Bewerbungen der ehemaligen SSG-Bibliotheken abgelehnt wurden, häufig lehnten sie sich aus DFG-Sicht zu stark am alten SSG-Konzept an). ..."

http://www.sulb.uni-saarland.de/de/suchen/fach/psycho/ Daher: Übergang zu http://www.zpid.de/

070316 jf via clara-liste

s.a. IuD-programm aus den 1970er jahren ...

http://wiki.aki-stuttgart.de/mediawiki/index.php/FID